秦时明月之君临天下
China rejects EU’s ‘unlawful’ extraterritorial overreach in JD.com probe; move signals Beijing’s resolve to safeguard its interests: expert_我的网站
A | 8月23日，经过30余小时的飞行与中转旅途，美国友人“赛考斯”（本名罗纳德·萨科尔斯基）抵达内蒙古鄂尔多斯伊金霍洛国际机场，与当地治沙模范殷玉珍重逢。1999年，来华任教的萨科尔斯基了解到殷玉珍夫妇的治沙故事后，通过基金会筹措5000美元善款，支持沙地植树。岁月流转，当年的资金已变成5万余棵树，牢牢扎根在毛乌素沙地。
China on Wednesday determined that the EU's cross-border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its probe into JD.com under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction, and said it is barring organizations and individuals from implementing or assisting with the measures.
This statement was made by China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other relevant departments. The announcement takes effect immediately.
The finding follows an investigation conducted pursuant to Articles 3 and 6 of China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. No organization or individual may implement or assist in implementing such measures, according to the official WeChat account of the MOJ on Wednesday evening.
The announcement sends a clear and firm message about China's position on the EU's unilateral measures, and the bloc should carefully weigh the broader implications of pursuing such actions, including the potential costs to its own interests and China-EU economic and trade relations, a Chinese expert said. Continued use of the FSR in this manner could erode investment confidence and further strain bilateral economic ties, the expert noted.
Countering extraterritorial overreach
A spokesperson for China's MOJ on Wednesday blasted the EU's targeting of JD.com, saying the bloc had arbitrarily demanded extensive and unnecessary information located in China from Chinese entities on a cross-border basis. Such demands are improper and constitute a serious violation of the international rule of law, the spokesperson said.
To safeguard China's sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice, together with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant authorities, determined in accordance with rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures that the EU's actions constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. Any organization or individual is therefore prohibited from complying with or assisting in the implementation of the measures, according to the spokesperson.
The MOJ spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrongful practices, stop abusing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation as an investigative tool, and provide a fair, just and predictable market environment for companies investing and operating in Europe. If the EU persists with such actions, China will take resolute countermeasures in accordance with law, the spokesperson said.
Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com's $2.5 billion bid for German electronics retailer Ceconomy may involve Chinese subsidies, European Union competition regulators claimed, as they opened a full-scale investigation into the deal, Reuters reported on May 28.
The acquisition will allow one of China's largest retailers to expand outside its home market via Ceconomy-owned electronic products retailers MediaMarkt and Saturn, Reuters reported.
The decision by the European Commission marks its first in-depth probe of a Chinese deal under its so-called FSR.
This marks another time the rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures have been invoked since they took effect in April.
In May, the MOJ, together with MOFCOM and other relevant departments, determined after an investigation that the EU's cross border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its investigation into Nuctech under the FSR constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The latest announcement concerning the EU's unilateral move under the FSR once again reflects the Chinese government's firm position on safeguarding national sovereignty, security and legitimate rights and interests, while also representing a clear response to the EU's relevant practices, Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
"The announcement sends a clear signal to the EU and other countries: China will not accept attempts by any country to use its domestic laws as a basis for exercising unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction over matters within China, particularly when such actions undermine China's sovereign rights and interests," said Jian.
Likewise, China will not accept attempts to unilaterally address economic and trade frictions through so-called legal instruments when doing so harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and the Chinese market, Jian said.
Call on fair, just market
The EU's frequent use of the FSR against Chinese companies is not an isolated occurrence.
In February, the European Commission announced an in-depth investigation under the FSR into Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Goldwind.
Responding to the bloc's move, a MOFCOM spokesperson said that the EU had recently frequently used the FSR to launch investigations into Chinese companies and had escalated investigations into Chinese wind power and security equipment companies to in-depth probes, showing clear targeting and discrimination. China has expressed serious concern and strong dissatisfaction over the moves.
The MOFCOM spokesperson said the EU's investigations had broadened the concept of "foreign subsidies" and involved multiple problems, including insufficient evidence to launch investigations and a lack of transparency in procedures, describing the practices as "typical protectionism in the name of 'fair competition.'"
In January 2025, following an investigation, MOFCOM already determined in accordance with the law that the EU's relevant practices constituted trade and investment barriers. Instead of correcting its practices, the EU has gone further down the wrong path.
"China has made its position very clear, and the EU should fully consider the consequences of continuing with such measures, including their potential impact on the EU itself and on China-EU economic and trade relations," Zhang Jian, a vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
If the EU continues to impose excessive restrictions on foreign companies through similar rules, it will not only raise compliance costs for multinational companies but could also undermine the competitiveness of European businesses, Zhang said, noting that the EU economy is already facing considerable challenges, while concerns over excessive regulation, bureaucracy and increasingly complex rules have also grown within Europe.
Moreover, such rules may ultimately constrain European companies as well as foreign businesses, experts noted. At a time when the EU economy is facing difficulties, adding more regulation and restrictions instead of addressing underlying problems would be akin to "drinking poison to quench thirst," potentially creating even greater problems for the European economy, Zhang said.
China and the EU are both major global economies. Chinese investment in Europe not only brings capital, but also creates jobs, strengthens supply chains, introduces new technologies and adds vitality to local markets, Jian said.
Moreover, from new-energy vehicles to air conditioners and other consumer products, Chinese companies have brought high-quality, cost-effective products to European consumers, helping meet much-needed market demand while providing consumers with greater choice.
Jian said that as China-EU cross border investment deepens, regulatory frictions are inevitable, but they should be addressed through dialogue and coordination rather than unilateral expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Respect for each other's judicial sovereignty and legal boundaries is essential to stable and predictable economic and trade ties, the expert said.
。（据《人民日报》8月24日报道）一场阔别重逢，跨越山海阻隔；一份赤诚约定，书写生态传奇。这场20多年后的双向奔赴，始于一份纯粹的跨国善意，见证了一片荒漠的涅槃新生。执着的坚守、温情的相助、生态的蝶变，汇聚成一段有温度、有力量的动人故事。这是一份珍贵的情谊。20多年前，“赛考斯”只是一名普通教师，感动于殷玉珍的治沙故事，筹款相助。20多年后，殷玉珍穿上一件绿色外套去接机，只为告诉他“当初荒凉的沙漠，如今已经是满眼绿色”。语言不通，但“两颗热爱大自然的心是相通的”；地域不同，但向往绿色、追逐美好的理念是一致的。一棵树就是一个信物，一片林就是一份约定。跨越20多年的“绿色之约”，生动诠释了不分国界、真诚相待的深厚友谊。
B | 这是一张动人的绿色答卷。
C | 5000美元何以变成5万棵树？答案就在殷玉珍的坚守里。面对黄沙，她立下“宁可种树累死，也不能让沙子欺负死”的誓言。经过多年不懈努力，殷玉珍夫妇让7万亩沙地，一步步变为生机盎然的绿洲。正如“赛考斯”所说，“在这个故事里，殷玉珍才是真正的主角”。从塞罕坝到毛乌素，从腾格里到塔克拉玛干，我国已成为全球增绿最多最快的国家……这背后，正是成千上万个“殷玉珍”的默默守护与奉献。一个农村妇女与一位美国教师，共同见证了一个国家如何将生态理念化为漫山遍野的绿色。
D | 这是一次中国故事的破圈传播。今年5月，殷玉珍一则寻友视频刷屏全网，亿万网友接力传播，仅26小时便寻得失联多年的“赛考斯”。
E | 100天后，“赛考斯”如约而至。从全网牵线到跨洋赴约，这本身就是一个动人的中国故事。当治沙故事顺着网线走出毛乌素、跨越太平洋，世界看到的不再是抽象的增绿数据，而是矢志不渝的坚守与一诺千金的信义。这让中国的绿色实践有了可触可感的温度，也让世界在更加鲜活的细节里，读懂中国生态文明建设的力量源泉与精神内核。林海扎根大地，情谊跨越山海。
F | 殷玉珍的坚守，是中国生态文明建设的朴素注脚；“赛考斯”的归来，是世界读懂中国的温暖视角。这场奔赴超越地理与时间，是人类命运与共的生动见证。而我们每一个人，都可以成为这场奔赴的同行者，让绿色传奇在更广阔的天地生生不息。（梅刘柯）。
Current article:http://9nq5e9g.xuanliaruamibinmilangca.shop/news/20260826_74571.html
Published on:13:51:10
